Common Negotiating Tactics

If you have a good story about a tactic that was used on you or by you, drop me a comment or link and Here is a list of 25 common tactics -

1.     Exploding Offers (artificial deadlines) – an exploding offer contains an extremely tight deadline creating pressure on the other party to conclude quickly.  The purpose of the exploding offer is to limit the time the other party has to consider alternatives.

2.     Russian Front – Presented with 2 options, A and B, one worse than the other.  Designed to pressure you into choosing the lesser of two evils.  Remember two wrongs don’t make it right, attach your own considerations as condition of acceptance.

3.     Defence by Committee – After a deal has been concluded one side will insist that it still needs to be ratified by some steering or executive committee.  Low and behold after the committee hearing, several concessions are required for approval.  This may continue for several iterations each time nibbling concessions.

4.     The Chicken – Combining a huge bluff with a threat of action – Strike or Lockout etc.  This high risk tactic increases the probability of deadlock, and if the bluff is called and the threat is not carried out, both credibility and power are lost.

5.     Intimidation, The Bully – Using either actual physical threat or implied physical threat to intimidate the other party into concessions they would not otherwise agree.  Sometimes emotional intimidation is used (anger, disbelief, crying, etc.).

6.     Snow Job – When negotiators overwhelm the other side with facts, demands and figures.  The other side has difficulty determining which are real, which are important, and which are distractions.  Lawyers and Governments often employ this tactic.

7.     Boulwareism – Name comes from Leo Boulware, Former VP for Labor Relations at General Electric.  Boulware despised traditional negotiation methods and created the “Best-offer-first” or “take-it-or-leave-it” ultimatum.  Difficulty is this type of negotiating increases the probability of deadlock because of the decreased satisfaction on the receiving end of such a tactic.

8.     Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing – some negotiators try to lull the other side into a false sense of security by praising their opponent’s skill and downplaying their own abilities only to continually request further concessions.  They will praise the other parties offer as reasonable and fair, but often claim they are not authorized to accept such and offer, if only it could be improved marginally in several areas.

9.     Higher Authority – Negotiator’s will purposefully dis-empower themselves from making decisions.  I’m not authorized to agree at that level.  I’ll need to review this with the CFO/Manager/Director etc.

10. The Mock Threat – indicating that such a position will have monumental consequences on ALL business between the 2 companies and not just the matter at hand.  “We will have to do a line review or product rationalization etc.”  Often combined with higher authority.  “it’s not me, it’s from Corporate”.

11. Good Cop Bad Cop – based on law enforcement interrogation techniques.  One party opens with a tough position often accompanied by threats, arrogant behavior, and unwillingness to consider anything else (parental).  After leaving the room, a second negotiator attempts to secure major concessions before the return of the first Bad Cop.  Sometimes disguised and used only when certain issues are brought up or certain thresholds are crossed.

12. Yes equals No – agree to a ridiculous proposal by attaching equally ridiculous demands as condition of acceptance.  Can be effective countering the Russian Front tactic.

13. Off the Record – using informal discussions to test and gauge potential responses to positions.  Testing the waters.  Sometimes informal discussions are necessary when an impasse has been reached.

14. Highball / Lowball – when your extreme opener is beyond the realm of realistic outcomes.  The idea is to cause the other party to reconsider their own opening position and move closer towards their breaking point.  Danger is the increased risk of deadlock before the negotiation even begin, crossing the “Piss Off” point.

15. Bogey ­– presenting a relatively minor issue as one of huge importance.  Later during the negotiation, the bogey will be conceded for major concessions on issues that are of real importance.  Danger is the other party may actually structure proposals to give you the bogey or worse yet, you may lose credibility when conceding on the bogey.

16. The Nibble – after considerable time has elapsed during a negotiation and a level of commitment has been reached, an issue not previously discussed is used as a way to close the deal…  “And one last thing”.  Example – just before agreeing to purchase a new car the buyer says – “Ok I’ll agree provided you throw in the extended warranty for free”.

17. Personal Favor – Be careful about using the personal favor, because one good turn deserves another.  If you request a favor you now owe someone a favor in return.

18. The Auction or Dutch Auction – designed to tap into the competitive nature of 2 or more individuals pitted against each other, causing them to lose sight of the actual value of the item being auctioned.

19. Deliberate misunderstanding – using intransigence to buy time.  “Can you take me through that proposal again”, usually followed with very specific questions about some of the issues.  “I’m having a hard time following you”, “I’m not sure I understand”.

20. Incorrect Summary – When one side while summarizing what has been agreed will purposefully add or change an issue in an attempt to slide it by the other side.  Will cause a deterioration of the climate and loss of credibility.

21. Bait and Switch – When the item you where negotiating for seems to be different then what you thought you were negotiating for.  Car dealers may claim, “Oh look, the serial number is for the black jeep and not the green one.  My manager can’t agree to this price on the green jeep, it has all these extra options, if you are able to take the black one we have a deal”.

22. Sow the Seed – Used by opening extreme and insisting the other party think about the offer before they respond.  Allowing the other party to go through the six stages of acceptance, minimizing the impact of the extreme offer by combining it with time to think about the proposal.

23. Denied Access – used to increase the time pressure on one party.  All forms of communication are cutoff in an attempt to create desperation from the other party.

24. The Flirt – an appeal to one parties ego through sexual flirtation or compliments.  Appeals to the social need “wanting to be liked”.

25. Peer Pressure – stemming from the days of the playground.  All your competitors will be carrying this product, or using this technology, etc. and you’ll be the only one missing this opportunity.


लेकिन भगवान् है साहब... भगवान् तो है

एक मेजर के नेतृत्व में 15 जवानों की एक टुकड़ी हिमालय के अपने रास्ते पर थी। उन्हें ऊपर कहीं अगले तीन महीने के लिए दूसरी टुकड़ी की जगह तैनात होना था। दुर्गम स्थान, ठण्ड और बर्फ़बारी ने चढ़ाई की कठिनाई और बढ़ा दी थी। बेतहाशा ठण्ड में मेजर ने सोचा कि अगर उन्हें यहाँ एक कप चाय मिल जाती तो आगे बढ़ने की ताकत आ जाती। 

लेकिन रात का समय था आस पास कोई बस्ती भी नहीं थी। लगभग एक घंटे की चढ़ाई के पश्चात् उन्हें एक जर्जर चाय की दुकान दिखाई दी, लेकिन अफ़सोस उस पर ताला लगा था। 

भूख और थकान की तीव्रता के चलते जवानों के आग्रह पर मेजर साहब दुकान का ताला तुड़वाने को राज़ी हो गया। खैर ताला तोड़ा गया तो अंदर उन्हें चाय बनाने का सभी सामान मिल गया। जवानों ने चाय बनाई साथ वहां रखे बिस्किट आदि खाकर खुद को राहत दी। थकान से उबरने के पश्चात् सभी आगे बढ़ने की तैयारी करने लगे, लेकिन मेजर साहब को यूँ चोरों की तरह दुकान का ताला तोड़ने के कारण आत्मग्लानि हो रही थी। 

उन्होंने अपने पर्स में से एक हज़ार रुपये निकाला और चीनी के डब्बे के नीचे दबाकर रख दिया तथा दुकान का शटर ठीक से बंद करवाकर आगे बढ़ गए। 

इससे मेजर की आत्मग्लानि कुछ हद तक कम हो गई और टुकड़ी अपने गंतव्य की ओर बढ़ चली। 

वहां पहले से तैनात टुकड़ी उनका इंतजार कर रही थी। इस टुकड़ी ने उनसे अगले तीन महीने के लिए चार्ज लिया व् अपनी ड्यूटी पर तैनात हो गए हो गए। तीन महीने की समाप्ति पर इस टुकड़ी के सभी 15 जवान सकुशल अपने मेजर के नेतृत्व में उसी रास्ते से वापिस आ रहे थे। रास्ते में उसी चाय की दुकान को खुला देखकर वहां विश्राम करने के लिए रुक गए। 

उस दुकान का मालिक एक बूढ़ा चाय वाला था जो एक साथ इतने ग्राहक देखकर खुश हो गया और उनके लिए चाय बनाने लगा। चाय की चुस्कियों और बिस्कुटों के बीच वो बूढ़े चाय वाले से उसके जीवन के अनुभव पूछने लगे खासतौर पर इतने बीहड़ में दुकान चलाने के बारे में।


बूढ़ा उन्हें कई कहानियां सुनाता रहा और साथ ही भगवान का शुक्र अदा करता रहा।

तभी एक जवान बोला "बाबा आप भगवान को इतना मानते हो अगर भगवान सच में होता तो फिर उसने तुम्हे इतने बुरे हाल में क्यों रखा हुआ है।"

बाबा बोला "नहीं साहब ऐसा नहीं कहते भगवान् तो है और सच में है... मैंने देखा है।"

आखरी वाक्य सुनकर सभी जवान कौतुहल से बूढ़े की ओर देखने लगे।

बूढ़ा बोला "साहब मैं बहुत मुसीबत में था एक दिन मेरे इकलौते बेटे को आतंकवादियों ने पकड़ लिया उन्होंने उसे बहुत मारा पीटा लेकिन उसके पास कोई जानकारी नहीं थी इसलिए उन्होंने उसे मार पीट कर छोड़ दिया।"
"मैं दुकान बंद करके उसे हॉस्पिटल ले गया मैं बहुत तंगी में था साहब और आतंकवादियों के डर से किसी ने उधार भी नहीं दिया।"

"मेरे पास दवाईयों के पैसे भी नहीं थे और मुझे कोई उम्मीद नज़र नहीं आती थी उस रात साहब मैं बहुत रोया और मैंने भगवान से प्रार्थना की और मदद मांगी "और साहब... 
उस रात भगवान मेरी दुकान में खुद आए।"

"मैं सुबह अपनी दुकान पर पहुंचा ताला टूटा देखकर मुझे लगा कि मेरे पास जो कुछ भी थोड़ा बहुत था वो भी सब लुट गया।"

"मैं दुकान में घुसा तो देखा 1000 रूपए, चीनी के डब्बे के नीचे भगवान ने मेरे लिए रखा हुआ है।"

"साहब... उस दिन एक हज़ार 
रुपये की कीमत मेरे लिए क्या थी शायद मैं बयान न कर पाऊं... लेकिन भगवान् है साहब... भगवान् तो है।" बूढ़ा फिर अपने आप में बड़बड़ाया।

भगवान के होने का आत्मविश्वास उसकी आँखों में साफ़ चमक रहा था।

यह सुनकर वहां सन्नाटा छा गया।

पंद्रह जोड़ी आंखें मेजर की तरफ देख रही थी जिसकी आंख में उन्हें अपने लिए स्पष्ट आदेश था, "चुप रहो।"

मेजर साहब उठे, चाय का बिल अदा किया और बूढ़े चाय वाले को गले लगाते हुए बोले "हाँ बाबा मैं जानता हूँ भगवान् है... और तुम्हारी चाय भी शानदार थी।"

और उस दिन उन पंद्रह जोड़ी आँखों ने पहली बार मेजर की आँखों में चमकते पानी  के दुर्लभ दृश्य का साक्ष्य किया।

और

सच्चाई यही है कि भगवान तुम्हें कब किसी का भगवान बनाकर कहीं भेज दे ये खुद तुम भी नहीं जानते...

क़ुपवाड़ा सेक्टर में घटित एक जवान द्वारा शेयर की गई सच्ची घटना (जम्मू एवं कश्मीर-भारत)

#साभार

Judge will not be human anymore

China made the world's first artificial intelligence equipped judge, gives 97% of the decisions right.

Everything is good until the remaining 3% are going to die.

Imagine anyone dying because of the mistake of AI. That won't be cool.

Anyways,
AI is really gonna be the highlight of this decade.

Things will be developed using AI, which you wouldn't have imagined at all.
This is even gonna beat the metaverse industry in terms of growth.

I wouldn't have thought of an AI judge, but China is really ahead in AI.

At this moment, China cannot be underestimated in any field, they are ahead of the USA in almost every tech.

They even have the highest number of patents in the world.

Alibaba has the highest number of blockchain patents in the world.

TikTok is built on AI, they have even a better algorithm than Instagram and Facebook despite being much younger.

If anything can kill China, it will be China themselves and their political structure.

Last year, antitrust investigations impacted their companies very badly.
Alibaba's stock has fallen almost 50% from last year's high.

They are now searching for global expansion as their growth in China is gonna be limited.

Focus on people to maximize plant efficiency

 Balancing people and technology to optimize plant operations

In its relentless march toward end-to-end automation, technology has continually up-ended the boundaries between man and machine in industrial enterprises.

With recent advances in artificial intelligence supported by endless computing resources in the cloud, we must now ask ourselves, “ how much longer will we need people directly involved in manufacturing?”

The fact is, we will always have people involved in process manufacturing plants. So perhaps the better approach is to look for ways to create an environment where we are able to balance the best attributes of people and technology to assure optimization of communication, safety and production.

The machine/human connection

In looking toward technology investments, the focus should not be simply on replacing people with machines but rather how, using the positive attributes of both people and machines, there can be productive and symbiotic relationships.

The human factor

You may think that the massive reduction in the price of computer memory over time would mean that the original Fitts list from the 1950s no longer applies.

However, many organizations have simply invested in data storage without considering how it will be accessed, understood and used in practice. Storing data only makes sense if it is relevant and actionable. This requires data that can be processed and appropriately visualized for people.

It is very easy to overwhelm people with data and make things too complicated. Understanding human factors is essential to avoid these problems.

Human memory works differently than machine memory. While machines are very good at capturing and storing data, humans are able to remember perceptions, images and feelings. Thus, only people can draw on human attributes to create a better understanding from things that have been experienced or memorized from past experiences.

Reliability is another example. Machines are reliable only for certain defined situations for which they’ve been programmed, i.e. repeating the same set of actions on a production line.

People, however, through their powers of perception, improvisation, detection, among other attributes, are reliable within and outside of the defined operational domain because they can continually adapt. Thus, the reliability of people and machines cannot be measured in the same way.

Technology can only do what we’ve asked it to do while people are able to create new processes or situations when the unexpected arises.

Perhaps the most relevant example of human adaptability has been the response to the upheaval caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Business as usual required creative workarounds to keep manufacturing processes in motion while workers at almost all levels were working from home or managing processes with skeleton crews. In many ways, these adaptations have been successful because of the creativity and adaptability of people, not the machines.

As technology has evolved, particularly with automation in process manufacturing plants, systems have become more complex. As the price of storing data has declined and cloud-based systems have emerged, more and more information is available for data mining, but in general, the process industry has not invested the millions of dollars necessary to ensure that the data can be utilized effectively.

Managing and mining the data is a ‘people’ activity. Thus, the concept of replacing people with machines should not be the focus. Instead, the emphasis should be on implementing technology that can be used effectively by people on the shop floor.

Complexities and advantages of IoT

IoT and the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) have delivered even more complexities as well as great advantages to process manufacturing. IIoT has brought together more components, delivered more data and connections, created situations where fewer people are needed to manage processes, and has hastened the speed to manage manufacturing processes. But with all these exponential – and ever- growing – changes, the question still remains. How do we handle how people will work and thrive in this fast-changing environment?

If we want technology to work, we need to design it for people. Referring back to the Fitts list and the understanding of human factors, it is important to recognize the true relevance of people in a process manufacturing environment.

Processes are run by many people at different levels and different sites within an organization. There is not one person who knows everything. There are – at the operations level – for example, several teams. Each of which has different goals and interests. The teams are active on different shifts and reporting up the line to various supervisors who, in turn, may be reporting into the corporate structure. All of these people and teams are using technology in some way to do their jobs. Technology deployed that is designed to help people and teams work together more collaboratively and thus, effectively will be far more successful that technology that is difficult to use and requires people to adapt their behaviors to use it.

Generally, people have a good memory when it comes to experiences, perceptions and emotions, but they are not so reliable when processing data when compared to a machine. Take, for example, a 12-hour shift. How much data is retained or forgotten during that shift? On a good day, a high proportion of data generated may be retained. On a stressful shift, it maybe only half. Transfer of data to the next team will be directly affected by this, especially when errors and omissions of communication are factored in.

People are always a bit imprecise. Relying on people to remember all information and to communicate it reliably either verbally or via written documents will always be problematic.. Inaccurate communication can result in many different issues including safety issues.

Recognizing the issues caused by imprecise transfer of information leads to a need to provide easy-to- use technology to support people to overcome their natural limitations. However, there will be much greater benefits if the technology does more than just handle data and enhances the natural human capabilities by allowing insights created during the shift to be transferred to the next shift so that they get a better understanding of what is happening and can act on it more quickly and effectively. Collaboration, via technology, among the shift teams creates a higher level of efficiency, quality and safety.

Quality digital shift handover process

Information shared during shift handovers represents a critical foundation for continuity. It serves as a running protocol of relevant events and conditions that together describe the state of manufacturing processes within a specific period. To align all these sources, technology in the form of a digital shift management solution, allows handovers and provides a formal digital record of plant operations that can be delivered digitally to all members of the manufacturing organization.

Embrace technology and the human factor

Technology won’t replace people. Our aim should be to use technology to enable people to use their natural capabilities and increase their performance. Successful manufacturing enterprises will embrace an approach that elevates the attributes of both people and technology to help the human-machine network work together in a more collaborative way. This will ensure more transparency, reliability and visibility across all plant functions to help teams better communicate and optimize outcomes. People-centric technology, in other words, technology that has been designed with people in mind, enables organizational teams to improve productivity, cost efficiencies, quality and safety.


Andreas Eschbach and Dr. Andy Brazier